Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support AsyncAPI 2.5.0 #647

Merged

Conversation

magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu commented Sep 27, 2022

Description

Changes proposed in this pull request:

Support AsyncAPI 2.5.0:

  • render tags in Server Object

image

Related issue(s)
Part of asyncapi/spec#830

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 27, 2022
@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu changed the title feat: support 2.5.0 feat: support AsyncAPI 2.5.0 Sep 27, 2022
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 29, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Sep 29, 2022

as separate issue we will handle discussion if we should enable grouping of servers by tag in documentation? like it is with operations?

Copy link
Member

@derberg derberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't forget to create followup issue 😉

@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member Author

@derberg #649 :)

@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member Author

/rtm

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu merged commit 836558c into asyncapi:next Sep 29, 2022
@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu deleted the next-branches/support-2.5.0 branch September 29, 2022 08:51
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0-next.43 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants